Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
301.79 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
It is intuitively felt that ambiguity plays a crucial role in human beings’ everyday life and in psychologists’
theoretical and applied work. However, ambiguity remains essentially non-problematised in psychological
science since its foundation. This article analyses positivist and social constructionist perspectives on ambiguity
in the context of their epistemological and ontological fundamental assumptions. The relational thesis of social
constructionism is further analysed and it is argued that it constitutes a “weak thesis” concerning the relational
constitution of human beings. In the second part, a dialogical alternative is elaborated. In this perspective,
ambiguity is placed in the context of relationship and both are brought to an ontological ground. Therefore, it is
argued, ambiguity is a fundamental property of human experience and plays a fundamental role in the constitution of (inter)subjective processes. The impact of this thesis on dialogical perspective on self is elaborated.
Description
Keywords
Dialogism Meaning-making