Repository logo
 
Publication

Warm-up for Sprint Swimming: Race-Pace or Aerobic Stimulation? A Randomized Study

dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Henrique P.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Mário C.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Tiago M.
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorViana, João L.
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Daniel A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T15:27:52Z
dc.date.available2021-04-28T15:27:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractNeiva, HP, Marques, MC, Barbosa, TM, Izquierdo, M, Viana, JL, Teixeira, AM, and Marinho, DA. Warm-up for sprint swimming: race-pace or aerobic stimulation? A randomized study. J Strength Cond Res 31(9): 2423-2431, 2017-The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 different warm-up intensities on 100-m swimming performance in a randomized controlled trial. Thirteen competitive swimmers performed two 100-m freestyle time-trials on separate days after either control or experimental warm-up in a randomized design. The control warm-up included a typical race-pace set (4 × 25 m), whereas the experimental warm-up included an aerobic set (8 × 50 m at 98-102% of critical velocity). Cortisol, testosterone, blood lactate ([La]), oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2), heart rate, core (Tcore and Tcorenet) and tympanic temperatures, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored. Stroke length (SL), stroke frequency (SF), stroke index (SI), and propelling efficiency (ηp) were assessed for each 50-m lap. We found that V[Combining Dot Above]O2, heart rate, and Tcorenet were higher after experimental warm-up (d > 0.73), but only the positive effect for Tcorenet was maintained until the trial. Performance was not different between conditions (d = 0.07). Experimental warm-up was found to slow SF (mean change ±90% CL = 2.06 ± 1.48%) and increase SL (1.65 ± 1.40%) and ηp (1.87 ± 1.33%) in the first lap. After the time-trials, this warm-up had a positive effect on Tcorenet (d = 0.69) and a negative effect on [La] (d = 0.56). Although the warm-ups had similar outcomes in the 100-m freestyle, performance was achieved through different biomechanical strategies. Stroke length and efficiency were higher in the first lap after the experimental warm-up, whereas SF was higher after control warm-up. Physiological adaptations were observed mainly through an increased Tcore after experimental warm-up. In this condition, the lower [La] after the trial suggests lower dependency on anaerobic metabolism.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000001701pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/1788
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.subjectAdolescentpt_PT
dc.subjectAthletic Performancept_PT
dc.subjectBody Temperaturept_PT
dc.subjectHeart Ratept_PT
dc.subjectHumanspt_PT
dc.subjectHydrocortisonept_PT
dc.subjectLactic Acidpt_PT
dc.subjectMalept_PT
dc.subjectOxygen Consumptionpt_PT
dc.subjectSwimmingpt_PT
dc.subjectTestosteronept_PT
dc.subjectWarm-Up Exercisept_PT
dc.subjectYoung Adultpt_PT
dc.subjectAthletespt_PT
dc.titleWarm-up for Sprint Swimming: Race-Pace or Aerobic Stimulation? A Randomized Studypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage2431pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue9pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage2423pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume31pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Warm-up for Sprint Swimming_ Race-Pace or Aerobic Stimulatio... _ The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.html
Size:
425.18 KB
Format:
Hypertext Markup Language