Publication
A comparison of match-physical demands between different tactical systems: 1-4-5-1 vs 1-3-5-2
| dc.contributor.author | Baptista, Ivan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johansen, Dag | |
| dc.contributor.author | Figueiredo, Pedro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rebelo, António | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pettersen, Svein Arne | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-29T13:04:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-29T13:04:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The team tactical system and distribution of the football players on the pitch is considered fundamental in team performance. The present study used time-motion analysis and triaxial-accelerometers to obtain new insights about the impact of different tactical systems (1-4-5-1 and 1-3-5-2) on physical performance, across different playing positions, in a professional football team. Player performance data in fifteen official home matches was collected for analysis. The sample included twenty-two players from five playing positions (centre backs: n = 4; full-back/wide midfielder/ wing-back: n = 9; centre midfielder: n = 6 and centre forward: n = 3), making a total of 108 match observations. A novel finding was that general match physical demands do not differ considerably between these tactical formations, probably because match-to-match variability (variation of players' running profile from match-to-match) might be higher than the differences in physical performance between tactical systems. However, change of formation had a different impact across playing positions, with centre backs playing in 1-4-5-1 performing significant more HIRcounts than in 1-3-5-2 (p = 0.031). Furthermore, a medium effect size (r = 0.33) was observed in HIRdist, with wide players covering higher distances when playing in 1-3-5-2 than in 1-4-5-1. These findings may help coaches to develop individualised training programs to meet the demands of each playing position according to the tactical system adopted. | pt_PT |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0214952 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/1800 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Adult | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Athletic Performance | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Football | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Humans | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Male | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Running | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Athletes | pt_PT |
| dc.title | A comparison of match-physical demands between different tactical systems: 1-4-5-1 vs 1-3-5-2 | pt_PT |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 4 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.startPage | e0214952 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | PLOS ONE | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.volume | 14 | pt_PT |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1